Synthesis
Ch. 4 (Jetton and Shanahan)
This chapter focuses on the idea that teacher planning is an important part of the learning process. Planning involves the preplanning ideas and organization that occurs before presenting a lesson. Research has shown that more experienced teachers use a skeletal planning framework, while newer teachers are more detailed in their planning. Planning can be effected by a multitude of factors: school budget, class size, ongoing activities, culture, and types of students. There can also be different types of planning; long term or short term. Teachers understand that as much pre-planning that goes on, it’s crucial to be able to make quick decisions during the lessons.
Keeping student identity a key component while planning, will help lessons be more applicable. Students come to classrooms with an identity, but their identity is always changing depending on their surrounds and what they are learning. By using a culturally responsive pedagogy, you will immerse your students in the lesson.
The classroom environment influences decisions in pre-planning. Having a “norm of practice” for each content area will help student learn and understand the process, procedures, and discourse of each subject. Involve students in the subject’s learning goals. They will be more likely to want to learn. They will see the whole picture if they are aware of the end goals. Allowing students to be a part of unit planning and assignments, will lead to motivation and ownership of the classroom material.
When planning lessons, it’s important to implement strategies that help with the following areas: activating prior knowledge, text importance, mental imagery, text structure, questioning, and inference making. These areas all help with comprehension. As teachers, we should try to incorporate learning segments that focus on comprehension and give students opportunities to practice. By giving students specific goals and strategies while reading, they will learn to comprehend better.
As teachers plan, they need to reflect on their planning practices. Looking at the learning goals long term is vital to student success. Seeing the whole picture, instead of tiny blocks of time, will generate a more cohesive and integrated lesson.
D2L (Fisher, Frey, and Ross)
Background knowledge and comprehension accompany each other. What a readers knows about a subject predicts what they will learn. Students need to be able to read things they understand. Books that are above their levels will not teach them more. They will likely not understand the books.
When students read, they need to have a purpose. Many times students are assigned a book but don't read it with purpose. Therefore they don't know what to pay attention to.
Students must have a large vocabulary to figure out what the text is about. Simply increasing vocabulary helps student's grasp what they've read. Using semantic maps and graphic organizers can help improve vocabulary.
Modeling helps students think in a variety of ways. Students who see teachers explaining their learning process will help students learn new ways to comprehend. The article suggest 4 ways teachers can model. They can use comprehension strategies. Show students how to decode unknown vocabulary. Teach students to decipher between text structures and text features. When these strategies are modeled, students will begin to use them in their own learning.
Another comprehension approach is using reciprocal teaching. Allow students to be the teachers and guide their peers. They become the leader in their own learning. The following are 4 steps to reciprocal teaching: summarizing, questioning, and clarifying, predicting.
Ch. 8 (Hinchman, sheridan-thomas)
Comprehension is essential for adolescents to have success in learning. "Simply surrounding students with complex texts and then expecting something to happen is magical thinking- if that was all that was necessary, we could merely send students to the school library and be done with it" (p 140). This sentence from the chapter stood out to me. Many teachers assume this to some degree. If we never allow time and teaching of strategies for comprehension, students will learn nothing.
Research has shown that an extensive vocabulary helps students comprehend various levels of text. Teachers need to realize this is an area of literacy that needs attention. Vocabulary lessons should be incorporated daily.
Letting students know what the purpose of learning certain material helps them take ownership. Everyone want to know why? When students know why, they can focus their attention. The material seems relevant to their lives.
Middle and high school material becomes more difficult as they progress. Modeling helps apprentice students to show them how something is done. This guides students in to different ways of thinking.
Response
After reading all the articles and chapters it became evident there were major themes. One that stood out to me was vocabulary. Students must continually broaden their vocabulary in order understand harder text. Another theme I saw was reading with a purpose. Students are always asking "why do I need to know this." As teachers, we should have an objective with what we teach. Keeping students involved with that objective helps them understand the whys. Even when I was teaching pre-k, I always put up an objective. It was a pretty simple objective, but students began to be explorers of their learning when they knew the objective. Each week they'd come into class and look for the new weekly objective. They also began exploring outside the classroom for those objectives. I found it interesting that in the readings the authors mentioned that text complexity wasn't always a good thing. If students can't read and understand, then they won't comprehend. They must be able to read and grasp the ideas.
Questions
1. What are some of the ways you build background knowledge?
2. In a room of diverse learner with different reading levels, how do you resolve the issue of text complexity? Certain books are required at different grade levels, how do you get through those books when some kids can't read them.
Hi Kaitlin! I have these same questions for my future classroom. I love the idea of letting the students be involved in nearly every step of their learning, including the planning. I think it's important that we teach children that school isn't about the teacher standing before them and dumping test answers into their brain. School is a learning community and it requires teamwork from all members, teachers and students, to be a successful environment!
ReplyDeleteI look at literacy education similarly to how I have been training to run my first 5K. First, I started off walking mostly with short running intervals. I have slowly been increasing my running intervals while decreasing my walking intervals. Some days, it's awful and I feel like I'll never get there. Then I'll run for five minutes straight without even realizing I had been running that long! I think it's important to give students something that makes sense to them. Give them the "easier" books or articles and then throw in something that's just a little bit more difficult. The brain, like any of our muscles, must be trained and conditioned to do harder tasks. I'm not sure if the curriculum would allow for that (in order to ensure students read required texts), that's probably something different in every district/school/class.
Great analogy! I Think you're right now. I've only taught younger grades, so chapter book reading/text book seems foreign to me. Seems over whelming to move everyone up reading levels when they are at different levels. The idea of slowly integrating material from manageable to harder as they grow is great! I think having kids all read the same book successful is unattainable but unfortunately is school districts it's not always a choice. I think books on tape for some kids is okay. While supplementing material for higher students. No reason the class can't learn about the same subjects, but even in grad school we all learn differently. We are given different approaches for the same assignment. Thanks for your insight!
ReplyDeleteReading with a purpose also was one of the main points that also stood out to me in this week's readings. Students are more likely to remember when they see a purpose in the text, and therefore they should have a degree of interest in what they are reading. This actually relates to one of my questions for this week, which was "how can we get students motivated to see a purpose in text that is required for students to read in school?" I just remember being in English classes in high school and with some of the texts we read together in class many students didn't want to learn. I think we should help this problem in our high school English classes in relation with helping them see purpose in some of the text required of them to read.
ReplyDeleteWhat great questions! How are you supposed to differentiate instruction when you're teaching one text? Sometimes I feel like teachers are supposed to manage to be 15 different people at once.
ReplyDeleteAs far as building background knowledge, the only thing I can think is that students have to read more (different texts) on the subject, but how do you build background knowledge in a student who doesn't want to build it??